LONG-TERM FUNCTIONAL AND HISTOLOGICAL OUTCOMES OF RAT’S SCIATIC NERVE RECOVERY AFTER SEVERE INJURY AND EXPERIMENTAL TREATMENT WITH SILICON MICROWIRES
Abstract
Severe peripheral nerve injuries both with traumatic limb amputations constitute a substantial part in all limb injuries especially during armed conflicts.
For nerve grafting, nerve fibers alignment and fabrication of mind-controlled prosthetic limbs the concept of regenerative nerve implants with peripheral nerve interfacing was proposed.
Silicon showed ideal properties not only for microelictronic devices fabrication but also as a favorable growth medium for neurons in vitro.
This study aimed at evaluating the impact of silicon wires as a part of nerve conduit on motor and sensory recovery simultaneously with distal nerve stump neurotization using rat sciatic nerve injury model.
Materials and methods. We performed experiments on 33 male Wistar rats that were divided into the following groups: I – sham-operated, II – those which received right sciatic nerve transection with 10 mm gap formation with autoneurografting, III – with 10 mm nerve gap bridged by allogenic decelullarized aorta with 4% carboxymethylcellulose hydrogel, IV – with 10 mm gap bridged by allogenic decelullarized aorta with 4% carboxymethylcellulose hydrogel and aligned p-type boron-ligated silicon wires.
12 weeks after operation all rats were examined using von Fray filaments and by Walking track analysis method. For histological analysis right sciatic nerves were harvested. Frozen sections were stained with H&E and nitric silver impregnation was performed. At distal nerve stump nerve fibers density was calculated. The obtained results were compared using nonparametric statistical tests.
Results. The histological analysis revealed differences in tissue reaction patterns between rats from autoneurografting group and conduit grafting groups.
Histomorphometric data showed that nerve fibers density in rats from group IV was significantly higher than that in rats from group III (aorta+hydrogel grafting), but remained lower than in group II (autoneurografting).
Morphometric data were supported by functional tests data: rats from group IV demonstrated higher values of SFI than those in group III and same as those in group II.
Conclusions. According to histological and functional data we can presume that use of silicon wires as a part of hollow conduit improves results of injured sciatic nerve regeneration.
References
Коломийцев A.K. Быстрый метод импрегнации азотнокислым серебром элементов периферической нервной системы, пригодный для целлоидиновых и парафиновых срезов / А.К Коломийцев, Ю.Б. Чайковский Т.Л. Терещенко //Архив анатомии, гистологии и эмбриологии. — 1981. — No 8. — С. 93 — 96
Периферійний нерв: нейро-судинно-десмальні взаємовідношення в нормі та при патології [Текст] / С. Геращенко, О. Дєльцова, А. Коломійцев, Ю. Чайковський. — Тернопіль: Укрмедкнига, 2005. — 380 с.
Birch R Nerve injuries sustained during warfare: Part I — Epidemiology. /R Birch, P Misra, M Stewart, W Eardley, A Ramasamy, К Brown et al. // The Bone & Joint Journal. — 2012. — 94-B(4). —P. 523—528
Deumens R. Repairing injured peripheral nerves: Bridging the gap. /R Deumens, A Bozkurt, MMeek, MMarcus, EJoosten, J Weis et al. / /Progress in Neurobiology. — 2010. — 92(3). —P. 245—276.
Frat C Comparison of Nerve, Vessel, and Cartilage Grafts in Promoting Peripheral Nerve Regeneration / C Frat, Y Geyik, A Aytekin, M Gbl, S Kam_J, В УіШсап et al. // Annals of Plastic Surgery. — 2014. — 73(1).-P. 54—61.
Ghafoor U Selectivity and Longevity of Peripheral-Nerve and Machine Interfaces: A Review / Ghcfoor U, Kim S, Hong K. //Frontiers in Neurorobotics. —2017— Vol. 11 (preprint).
Grill W. Implanted Neural Interfaces: Biochallenges and Engineered Solutions / W Grill, S Norman, R. Bellamkonda // Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering. — 2009 — 11(1). P. 1—24.
Houschyar K. The Role of Current Techniques and Concepts in Peripheral Nerve Repair. / К Houschyar, A Momeni, M Pyles, J Cha, Z Maan, D Duscher et al. //Plastic Surgery International. — 2016. —P. 1—8.
Hunt T, Wiesel S. Operative techniques in hand, wrist, and forearm surgery. 1st ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2011.
James R, Regenerative engineering and bionic limbs. / R James, C. Laurencin //Rare Metals. — 2015. — 34(3). —P. 143—155.
Kim W. Interfacing Silicon Nanowires with Mammalian Cells. / W Kim, J Ng, M Kunitake, В Conklin, P Yang // Journal of the American Chemical Society. - 2007. - 129(23). - P. 7228-7229.
Kim Y, Material considerations for peripheral nerve interfacing. / Y Kim, M Romero-Ortega//MRS Bulletin. - 2012. - 37(06).-P. 573-580.
Klimovskaya A.I. Growth of silicon self-assembled nanowires by using gold-enhanced CVD technology. /А.І. Klimovskaya, Yu. Yu. Kalashnyk, A.T. Voroshchenko, O.S. Oberemok, Yu.M. Pedchenko, P.M. Lytvyn // Semiconductor Physics, Quantum Electronics and Optoelectronics. — 2018. - 21.-P. 282—287.
Klimovskaya A. Coulomb interactions at the silicon wire-nervous tissue interface. / A. Klimovskaya , Yu. Chaikovsky, O. Naumova, N. Vysotskaya, A. Korsak, V. Likhodiievskyi,B. Fomin // World of medicine and biology. - 2016. - 55(1). P. 136-141
Missios S. Traumatic peripheral nerve injuries in children: epidemiology and socioeconomics. / S Missios, К Bekelis, R. Spinner // Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics. — 2014. — 14(6). — 688—694.
PabariA. Modern surgical management of peripheral nerve gap. / A Pabari, S Yang, A Seifalian, A. Mosahebi // Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery. — 2010. — ;63(12). — P. 1941—1948.
Raimondo S. Chapter 5 Methods and Protocols in Peripheral Nerve Regeneration Experimental Research. / S Raimondo, M Fornaro, F Di Scipio, G Ronchi, M Giacobini Robecchi, S. Geuna // International Review of Neurobiology. — 2009. —P. 81—103.
Rivera J. Disability following combat-sustained nerve injury of the upper limb./JRivera, GGlebus, M. Cho//The Bone & Joint Journal.— 2014. -96-B(2). -P. 254—258.
Rodriguez M. Development of a mechanically tuneable 3D scaffold for vascular reconstruction. / M Rodriguez, C Juran, M McClendon, C Eyadiel, P McFetridge // Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. - 2012. - 100A(12). -P. 3480-3489.
Rossini P. Double nerve intraneural interface implant on a human amputee for robotic hand control. / P Rossini, S Micera, A Benvenuto, J Carpaneto, G Cavallo, L Citi et al. // Clinical Neurophysiology. — 2010. — 121(5).-P. 777—783.
Schonauer F., Marlino S., Avvedimento S., Molea G. (2012). Peripheral Nerve Reconstruction with Autologous Grafts, Basic Principles of Peripheral Nerve Disorders, Dr. SeyedMansoorRayegani (Ed.), InTech, DOI: 10.5772/29915.
Schoenfeld A. Pelvic, spinal and extremity wounds among combat-specific personnel serving in Iraq and Afghanistan (2003—2011): A new paradigm in military musculoskeletal medicine. / A Schoenfeld, J. Dunn, P. Belmont //Injury, Int. J. Care Injured. — 2013. — 44. —P. 1866— 1870.
Sarikcioglu LI Walking track analysis: an assessment method for functional recovery after sciatic nerve injury in the rat /L Sarikcioglu, BM Demirel,A. Utuk//FoliaMorphol (Warsz). — 2009. — Feb.,68(1). — P. 1—7.
Siemionow M. Chapter 8 Current Techniques and Concepts in Peripheral Nerve Repair / M Siemionow, G Brzezicki // International Review of Neurobiology. — 2009. —P. 141—172
Tsema, I. Clinico-statistical investigation of the extremity amputation level in wounded persons / Tsema, I, Khomenko, I, BespalenkoA., Buryanov O., Mishalov V., KikhA. // 2017. — Kliniches- kaia khirurgiia. - 51 (10). - doi 10.26779/2522-1396.2017.10.51.
Tsema I. Study of Damaging Factors of Contemporary War, Leading to the Limb Loss /1. Tsema, A. Bespalenko, A. Dinets, B. Koval, V. Mishalov // 2018. — Novosti Khirurgii. — 26(3). P. 321—331
Wright J A Review of Control Strategies in Closed-Loop Neuroprosthetic Systems. / J Wright, VMacefield, A van Schaik, J Tapson / /Frontiers in Neuroscience. — 2016. — 10. —P. 312.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
ISSN
ISSN 














