The use of a predictive model of postoperative complications and a protocol for assessing the effectiveness of anesthesia in reconstructive and aesthetic surgical interventions on the mammary glands
Abstract
When developing recommendations for choosing a method of anesthesia for reconstructive and aesthetic surgical interventions on the mammary glands, it is important to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of anesthetic management. In addition to the effect on the central nervous system, general anesthesia has a complex effect on the body, including causing changes in various parts of the metabolism. Metabolic changes associated with surgical stress include activation of catabolic processes and increased proteolysis. The aim of this work was to develop a model for assessing the effectiveness of anesthesia during reconstructive and aesthetic surgical interventions on the mammary glands, as well as to develop an appropriate protocol. The work carried out a step-by-step assessment of the effectiveness of anesthetic management in reconstructive operations on the mammary glands. The performance evaluation tool for creating a predictive risk model in our work was a categorical analysis of the frequency of surgical complications, as well as hemodynamic and metabolic changes, depending on the physical status of patients with ASA. To create a predictive risk model, we used a binary logistic regression method using the SPSS special-purpose package. The probability of postoperative complications was taken as a dichotomous variable in accordance with independent variables. Among the independent variables, the model included such numerical parameters as age, body mass index, glucose, creatinine, intraoperative BIS, intraoperative systolic blood pressure, duration of intervention, pain syndrome 24 hours after the intervention, cognitive impairment 24 hours after the intervention. Among the categorical variables, the type of anesthesia, the class of the patient according to ASA were selected. In the proposed protocol for assessing the effectiveness of anesthesia during reconstructive and aesthetic surgical interventions on the mammary glands, when the threshold sum of coefficients is reached, a risk group is determined using a scale. The sum of prognostic coefficients is equal to or lower than -19.8, the risk is minimal; greater than -19.8 and less than 19.8, the risk is uncertain; if equal to or higher than 19.8, the risk is high. The sensitivity of the protocol was 95.7%, specificity - 93.5%, positive predictive value - 91.8%, negative predictive value - 92.9%. Factor analysis of clinical, anamnestic, instrumental and laboratory parameters in patients who underwent reconstructive and aesthetic surgical interventions on the mammary glands made it possible to establish groups of factors that determine the variability of signs. The developed protocol for assessing the effectiveness of anesthesia during reconstructive and aesthetic surgical interventions on the mammary glands is characterized by parameters of clinical value sufficient for the anesthetic support of reconstructive and aesthetic surgical interventions on the mammary glands.
References
Kumar G, Stendall C, Mistry R, et al. A comparison of total intravenous anaesthesia using propofol with sevoflurane or desflurane in ambulatory surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Anaesthesia. 2014; 69 (10): 1138-50.
Nakai A, Nakada T, Okamoto S, Takahashi Y, Sakakura N, Nakada J, Kuroda H. Risk factors for postoperative nausea and vomiting after thoracoscopic pulmonary wedge resection: pitfalls of an increased fentanyl dose. J. Thorac. Dis. 2021; 13 (6): 3489-3496.
Passos SC, Stahlschmidt A, Blanco J, Spader ML, Brandão RB, Castro SMJ, Gutierrez CS, Silva Neto PCD, Stefani LPC. Derivation and validation of a national multicenter mortality risk stratification model - the ExCare model: a study protocol. Braz. J. Anesthesiol. 2021: S0104-0014(21)00283-9.
Pokkinen SM, Yli-Hankala A, Kalliomäki ML. The effects of propofol vs. sevoflurane on post-operative pain and need of opioid. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014; 58 (8): 980–5.
Salomé A, Harkouk H, Fletcher D, Martinez V. Opioid-Free Anesthesia Benefit-Risk Balance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J. Clin. Med. 2021; 10 (10): 2069.
Singler B, Tröster A, Manering N, Schüttler J, Koppert W. Modulation of remifentanil-induced postinfusion hyperalgesia by propofol. Anesth. Analg. 2007; 104 (6): 1397–403
Tyagi A, Ramanujam M, Sethi AK, Mohta M. Clinical utility of epidural volume extension following reduced intrathecal doses: a randomized controlled trial. Braz. J. Anesthesiol. 2021; 71 (1): 31-37.
Wong SSC, Leung MYY, Cheung CW. The effect of total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol on postoperative pain after third molar surgery: A double-blind randomized controlled trial. Eur. J. Pain. 2019; 23 (5): 884–93.
Woodworth GE, Ivie RMJ, Nelson SM, Walker CM, Maniker RB. Perioperative Breast Analgesia: A Qualitative Review of Anatomy and Regional Techniques. Reg. Anesth. Pain Med. 2017; 42 (5): 609–31
Yu W. Anesthesia with propofol and sevoflurane on postoperative cognitive function of elderly patients undergoing general thoracic surgery. Pak. J. Pharm. Sci. 2017; 30 (3 Special): 1107–10.
Zhao X, Wang H, Wang HJ, Wang Y, Xing YA, Li ST, Chen LH. Risk Factors for Fentanyl-Induced Cough Following General Anesthesia in Adults: A Retrospective Study from a Single Center in China. Med. Sci. Monit. 2021; 27: e930369.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
ISSN
ISSN 














