Effectiveness of using active drains in primary breast augmentation

  • Yurii Pidchenko Department of plastic and reconstructive surgery of postgraduate education Bogomolets National Medical University, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • Vasyl Khrapach Department of plastic and reconstructive surgery of postgraduate education Bogomolets National Medical University, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • Khrapach Oleksandr Department of plastic and reconstructive surgery of postgraduate education Bogomolets National Medical University, Kyiv, Ukraine
Keywords: Surgery; Plastic; Hematoma; Drainage; adverse effects; rehabilitation.

Abstract

the purpose of this work was to analyze the etiopathogenetic hematoma risk factors in order to identify them at the stage of planning the operation. The risk of hematoma is directly dependent on the level of bleeding during the operation and the reliability of intraoperative hemostasis. In general, these factors affect the level of bleeding, shifting the coagulation balance towards hypocoagulation. In addition, they could increase blood pressure or the permeability of the vascular wall. Their knowledge and detection before surgery prevents the occurrence of potential complications and makes it possible to optimize the aesthetic result. In addition, the risk of postoperative hematoma may increase as the volume of surgery increases. This happens because of the gradual fatigue increase of the surgeon, as well as the development of systemic changes in the patient's body. A critical period was determined like 24 hours after surgery, when there is the highest risk of early complications. This period requires a careful approach in the postoperative care planning. The development of postoperative hematoma is associated with a number of negative consequences. Among them, the necessity of re-hospitalization and return to the operating room in order to achieve final hemostasis, loss of time for the surgeon, additional anesthesia for the patient, extended hospital stay and all associated financial losses. The development of a hematoma remotely increase the risk of capsular contracture, which is the one of the most common reasons for reoperations after breast augmentation and leads to significant stigmatization of female patients. The analysis of actual sources did not reveal the evident connection between the use of active drainage after primary breast augmentation and the prevention of early postoperative complications. Therefore, when comparing the positive and negative consequences of their routine use, according to current research, the negative ones prevail. The combination of such factors as the achievement of thorough intraoperative hemostasis, fixation of the mammary glands, and the use of properly selected compression underwear, makes it possible to abandon the routine use of active drains without increasing the risk of early complications development during primary breast augmentation. Considering the fact that the hematoma is a proven risk factor for the capsular contracture formation, it is necessary to further investigation of drains effectiveness in order to prevent the development of capsular contracture in the long term.

References

Abboushi N, Yezhelyev M, Symbas J, Nahai F. Facelift complications and the risk of venous thromboembolism: a single center’s experience. Aesthet Surg J. 2012;32(4):413-420.

Bachour Y. Capsular Contracture in Breast Implant Surgery: Where Are We Now and Where Are We Going? Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2021 Jun;45(3):1328-1337. doi: 10.1007/s00266-021-02141-6. Epub 2021 Feb 8. PMID: 33559094.

Becker FF, Castellano RD. Safety of face-lifts in the older patient. Arch Facial Plast Surg.2004;6(5):311-314.

Charles-de-Sá L, Gontijo-de-Amorim NF, Rossi JK, Messeder AMDC, Jorge LNA, da Mota DSC, Aboudib JH. Drainage on augmentation mammoplasty: Does it work? J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021 May;74(5):1093-1100. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2020.10.059. Epub 2020 Nov 7. PMID: 33250388.

a. Collins JB, Verheyden CN. Incidence of breast hematoma after placement of breast prostheses. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Mar;129(3):413e-420e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182402ce0. PMID: 22373988.

Costa CR, Ramanadham SR, O’Reilly E, Coleman JE, Rohrich RJ. The role of the superwet technique in face lift: an analysis of 1089 patients over 23 years. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;135(6):1566-1572.

Daar DA, Bekisz JM, Chiodo MV, DeMitchell-Rodriguez EM, Saadeh PB. Hematoma After Non-Oncologic Breast Procedures: A Comprehensive Review of the Evidence. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2021 Dec;45(6):2602-2617. doi: 10.1007/s00266-021-02276-6. Epub 2021 Apr 16. PMID: 33864116.

Ellsworth WA, Basu CB, Iverson RE. Perioperative considerations for patient safety during cosmetic surgery—preventing complications. Can J Plast Surg. 2009;17(1):9-16.

Gherardini, G.; Zaccheddu, R.; Milner, S. M.; El-Shazlyl, M.; Liapakis, I. Breast augmentation with silicone implants: the role of surgical drainage—report on 502 consecutive patients. Eur J Plast Surg. 2006; 29: 9 –12.

Gusenoff JA. Prevention and management of complications in body contouring surgery. Clin Plast Surg. 2014;41(4):805-818.

Hadad E, Wiser I, Rosenthal A, Landau G, Ziv E, Heller L, Suction drains in aesthetic breast implant exchange are associated with surgical site infections: A retrospective cohort study, British Journal of Plastic Surgery (2017)

Hemmingsen MN, Larsen A, Ørholt M, Rasmussen LE, Weltz TK, Andersen PS, Sarmady F, Elberg JJ, Vester-Glowinski PV, Herly M. Hematoma and deep surgical site infection following primary breast augmentation: A retrospective review of 1128 patients. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2022 Mar;75(3):1197-1203. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.11.067. Epub 2021 Nov 27. PMID: 34924323.

Hood K(1), Ganesh Kumar N(2), Kaoutzanis C, Higdon K.K. Hematomas in Aesthetic Surgery. Aesthet Surg J. 2018 Aug 16; 38(9):1013-1025.

Hvilsom, G. B., Hölmich, L. R., Henriksen, T. F., Lipworth, L., McLaughlin, J. K., & Friis, S. (2009). Local complications after cosmetic breast augmentation: results from the Danish Registry for Plastic Surgery of the breast. Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 124(3), 919-925

ISAPS international survey on aesthetic/cosmetic procedures performed in 2020. 2021

Kaoutzanis C, Winocour J, Gupta V, Ganesh Kumar N, Sarosiek K, Wormer B et al (2017) Incidence and risk factors for major hematomas in aesthetic surgery: analysis of 129,007 patients. Aesthet Surg J 37(10):1175–1185

Liu W, Luan J. Recent Advances on the Application of Negative Pressure External Volume Expansion in Breast Plastic Surgery. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2018 Feb;42(1):112-117. doi: 10.1007/s00266-017-0986-9. Epub 2017 Oct 26. PMID: 29075815.

Martén E, Langevin CJ, Kaswan S, Zins JE. The safety of rhytidectomy in the elderly. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127(6):2455-2463.

Nguyen L, Gupta V, Afshari A, Shack RB, Grotting JC, Higdon KK. Incidence and risk factors of major complications in brachioplasty: analysis of 2,294 patients. Aesthet Surg J. 2016;36(7):792-803.

Nishioka H, Yasunaga Y, Yanagisawa D, Yuzuriha S, Ito KI. Where do you insert a drain tube during breast reconstruction? Surg Today. 2020 Dec;50(12):1626-1632. doi: 10.1007/s00595-020-02043-1. Epub 2020 Jun 7. PMID: 32507906.

Pallara T, Fortunato L, Folli S, Roncella M, Scuderi N, Friedman D, Arnez Z, Ribuffo D, Manna E, Persichetti P; Senonetwork Italia Breast Centres Responders. Practice patterns regarding drains management in breast surgery: Results of a survey of Senonetwork Italia breast centers. Breast J. 2020 Mar;26(3):560-562. doi: 10.1111/tbj.13602. Epub 2019 Sep 23. PMID: 31549473.

Richard P, Huesler R, Banic A, Erni D, Plock JA. Perioperative risk factors for haematoma after breast augmentation. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2013;47(2):130-134.

Shima H, Kutomi G, Sato K, Kuga Y, Wada A, Satomi F, Uno S, Nisikawa N, Kameshima H, Ohmura T, Mizuguchi T, Takemasa I. An Optimal Timing for Removing a Drain After Breast Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Surg Res. 2021 Nov;267:267-273. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.05.031. Epub 2021 Jun 23. PMID: 34171562.

Torresetti, M., Zavalloni, Y., Peltristo, B. et al. A Shakespearean Dilemma in Breast Augmentation: to Use Drains or not? a Systematic Review. Aesth Plast Surg (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02693-7

US Food and Drug Administration. (2020). Risks and Complications of Breast Implants. (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/breast-implants/risks-and-complications-breast-implants).

Woo PYM, Ng BCF, Xiao JX, et al. The importance of aspirin, catheterization accuracy, and catheter design in external ventricular drainage-related hemorrhage: a multicenter study of 1002 procedures. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2019;161:1623–32.

Xiao Y, Hu J, Zhang M, Zhang W, Qin F, Zeng A, Wang X, Liu Z, Zhu L, Yu N, Si L, Long F, Ding Y. To use indwelling drainage or not in dual-plane breast augmentation mammoplasty patients: A comparative study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jul 17;99(29):e21305. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021305. PMID: 32702925; PMCID: PMC7373562.

Yoon, Chung JH, Hwang NH, Lee BI, Partk SH, Yoon ES. Bacterial profile of suction drains and the relationship thereof to surgical-site infections in prosthetic breast reconstruction. Arch Plast Surg. 2018 Nov; 45(6):542-549.

Published
2024-09-30
How to Cite
1.
Pidchenko Y, Khrapach V, Oleksandr K. Effectiveness of using active drains in primary breast augmentation. USMYJ [Internet]. 2024Sep.30 [cited 2026Jul.12];149(3):39-5. Available from: https://mmj.nmuofficial.com/index.php/journal/article/view/432