Episiotomy in modern obstetrics
Abstract
perineal trauma is an urgent problem of modern obstetrics. Episiotomy is one of the methods of prevention of severe perineal trauma during childbirth. Episiotomy is a surgical procedure to dilate the vaginal opening by cutting the perineum during the second period of labor in order to accelerate and facilitate the birth of the fetus during vaginal delivery. The overuse of episiotomy is still a significant problem in Ukrainian obstetrics. The article presents a literature review, meta-analyses and results of individual studies on the use of this procedure in modern conditions. Despite the fact that the use of episiotomy in modern obstetrics is limited, there are cases when it should be considered. Situations in which it can be useful include the need for accelerated vaginal delivery, operative vaginal delivery using vacuum extraction and obstetric forceps, as well as fetal shoulder dystocia, and a history of female genital mutilation. Types of episiotomy incisions are given. The most widely used types of episiotomy are median and mediolateral, which do not increase the risk of anal sphincter rupture. It is indicated that it is important to consider their risks and benefits when choosing an incision method. Recommendations are given for refusing to perform routine episiotomy for women who give birth vaginally, and the decision to perform it should be made on an individual basis, not routinely. The decision to perform an episiotomy largely depends on the clinical picture in the second period of labor and the opinion of the attending physician. The analysis showed that episiotomy has not lost its relevance in modern obstetrics. However, episiotomy may be associated with a higher rate of severe perineal trauma and wound complications. Thus, for women who give birth vaginally, it is recommended to refuse routine episiotomy. The decision to perform an episiotomy is made on an individual basis.
References
Alperin M, Krohn MA, Parviainen K. Episiotomy and increase in the risk of obstetric laceration in a subsequent vaginal delivery. ObstetGynecol 2008; 111(6):1274-8. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31816de899.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics. Practice Bulletin No. 165: Prevention and Management of Obstetric Lacerations at Vaginal Delivery. ObstetGynecol 2016; 128(1):e1-e15. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001523.
Bottoms S. Delivery of the premature infant. ClinObstetGynecol 1995;38(4):780-9. doi: 10.1097/00003081-199538040-00012.
Carroli G, Mignini L. Episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009Jan 21:(1):CD000081. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000081.pub2. PMID: 19160176; PMCID: PMC4175536
Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 198: Prevention and Management of Obstetric Lacerations at Vaginal Delivery. ObstetGynecol 2018;132(3):e87-e102. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002841.Reaffirmed 2022.
Fitzgerald MP, Weber AM, Howden N, et al. Risk factors for anal sphincter tear during vaginal delivery. ObstetGynecol 2007; 109(1):29-34. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000242616.56617.ff.
Friedman AM, Ananth CV, Prendergast E, et al. Variation in and factors associated with use of episiotomy. JAMA 2015;313(2):197-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.14774.
Gayle C, Rymer J. Female genital mutilation and pregnancy: associated risks. Br J Nurs 2016; 25(17):978-983. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2016.25.17.978.
Gudu W, Abdulahi M. Labor, delivery and postpartum complications in nulliparous women with female genital mutilation admitted to karamara hospital. Ethiop Med J 2017;55(1):11-7.
Hale RW, Ling FW. Episiotomy: Procedure and repair techniques. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; Washington, DC, 2007; 24(4):6-11.
Healthy Moms, Healthy Babies: Hospital Performance on Leapfrog’s Maternity Care Standards Based on Results of the 2020 Leapfrog Hospital Survey. The Leapfrog Group. https://www.leapfroggroup.org/sites/default/files/Files/2021%20Maternity%20Report_Final_1.pdf (Accessed on February 14, 2022).
Jiang H, Qian X, Carroli G, Garner P. Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;2(2):CD000081. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000081.pub3.
Klein MC, Gauthier RJ, Jorgensen SH, et al. Does episiotomy prevent perineal trauma and pelvic floor relaxation. Online J CurrClin Trials 1992;Doc No 10:[6019 words; 65 paragraphs]. doi: 10.1097/00006254-199404000-00008.
Klein MC, Gauthier RJ, Robbins JM, et al. Relationship of episiotomy to perineal trauma and morbidity, sexual dysfunction, and pelvic floor relaxation. Am J ObstetGynecol 1994;171(3):591-8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(94)90070-1.
Kudish B, Blackwell S, Mcneeley SG, et al. Operative vaginal delivery and midline episiotomy: a bad combination for the perineum. Am J ObstetGynecol 2006; 195(3):749-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.06.078.
Macleod M, Strachan B, Bahl R, et al. A prospective cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery. BJOG 2008;115(13): 1688-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01961.x.
Muraca GM, Liu S, Sabr Y, et al. Episiotomy use among vaginal deliveries and the association with anal sphincter injury: a population-based retrospective cohort study. CMAJ 2019; 191(42): E1149–E1158.doi: 10.1503/cmaj.190366.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Intrapartum care for healthy women and babies. NICE Guidelines[CG190], National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 2014; 349:g6886. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g6886.
Okusanya BO, Oduwole O, Nwachuku N, Meremikwu MM. Deinfibulation for preventing or treating complications in women living with type III female genital mutilation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J GynaecolObstet 2017;136 Suppl 1:13-20. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12056.
Pergialiotis V, Vlachos D, Protopapas A, et al. Risk factors for severe perineal lacerations during childbirth. Int J GynaecolObstet 2014;125(1):6-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.09.034.
Pergialiotis V, Bellos I, Fanaki M, et al. Risk factors for severe perineal trauma during childbirth: An updated meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2020; 247:94-100. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.02.025.
Röckner G, Jonasson A, Olund A. The effect of mediolateral episiotomy at delivery on pelvic floor muscle strength evaluated with vaginal cones. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1991; 70:51.doi: 10.3109/00016349109006178.
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Green-top guideline No. 26: Operative vaginal delivery, 2011; 127(9):e70-e112. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16092. https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/gtg26.pdf (Accessed on August 03, 2016).
Sagi-Dain L, Sagi S. The role of episiotomy in prevention and management of shoulder dystocia: a systematic review. ObstetGynecolSurv 2015; 70(5):354-62. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0000000000000179.
Sartore A, De Seta F, Maso G, et al. The effects of mediolateral episiotomy on pelvic floor function after vaginal delivery. ObstetGynecol 2004;103(4):669-673 doi: 10.1097.01.aog.0000119223.04441.c9.
Stones RW, Paterson CM, Saunders NJ. Risk factors for major obstetric haemorrhage. Eur J ObstetGynecolReprodBiol 1993; 48(1):15-8. doi: 10.1016/0028-2243(93)90047-g.
Sultan AH, Thakar R, Ismail KM, et al. The role of mediolateral episiotomy during operative vaginal delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2019;240:192-196. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.07.005.
Thubert T, Cardaillac C, Fritel X, Winer N, Dochez V. Definition, epidemiology and risk factors of obstetric anal sphincter injuries: CNGOF Perineal Prevention and Protection in Obstetrics Guidelines. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2018;46(12):913-21. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2018.10.028.
vanBavel J, Hukkelhoven CWPM, de Vries C, et al. The effectiveness of mediolateral episiotomy in preventing obstetric anal sphincter injuries during operative vaginal delivery: a ten-year analysis of a national registry. IntUrogynecol J 2018; 29(3):407-413. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3422-4.
Woolley RJ. Benefits and risks of episiotomy: a review of the English-language literature since 1980. Part I. ObstetGynecolSurv 1995; 50(11):821-35. doi:10.1097/00006254-199511000-00021.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
ISSN
ISSN 














