Approach to P16 and Ki-67 in the Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia staging
Abstract
cervical cancer is a tumor resulting from infection with high-risk human papillomavirus and develops from precursors within the epithelium, which are now referred to as squamous intraepithelial lesions or cervical intraepithelial neoplasias (SIL/CIN). CIN is categorized into CIN1, CIN2, and CIN3 depending on the degree of epithelial involvement. The treatment of patients with pre-invasive cervical lesions relies on the determined histological classification. The primary objective of this study was to thoroughly assess the relevance of immunohistochemical staining for the biomarkers p16 and Ki67 in the evaluation of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions (SIL). This research aimed to elucidate the relationship between the levels of expression of these biomarkers and the various stages of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). By analyzing the correlation between p16 and Ki67 expression and the severity of CIN lesions, the study seeks to enhance the understanding of these immunohistochemical markers' diagnostic and prognostic value in clinical practices for managing HPV-related cervical pathology. Materials and methods. We analyzed cases of women with suspected cervical neoplasia during cytology investigation. H&E-stained and IHC slides of all biopsy samples were reviewed and classified according to the criteria outlined by the LAST project. All histological samples were processed according to routine procedures. Results. We found, that p16 expression is divided into three groups: negative, strong and diffuse block-positive, and focal or patchy positive reaction. In cases histologically classified as CIN1, p16 showed inconsistent positivity with a moderate intensity. The glandular epithelium displayed clear signs of atypia, and p16 revealed inconsistent moderate positivity. Ki-67 was expressed in cells nuclear in the basal and parabasal layers of the squamous epithelium in all CIN stages. The results showed significant p16 and Ki67 expression differences among different groups of CIN. The expression levels of P16 and Ki-67 showed a positive correlation with the severity of cervical lesions and are very helpful for distinguishing CIN1 from CIN2 and CIN3. Conclusions. The expression levels indicating a consistent increase in expression that reflects the progression. Utilizing both P16 and Ki-67 can help identify patients at a higher risk for Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC). The applications of p16 and Ki-67 have proven to be important supplementary tools in evaluating the actual characteristics of these lesions. The staining results of p16 and Ki-67 across various histological grades of cervical lesions underscore their usefulness in validating histological diagnoses.
References
Voidăzan ST, Dianzani C, Husariu MA, Geréd B, Turdean SG, Uzun CC, et al. The Role of p16/Ki-67 Immunostaining, hTERC Amplification and Fibronectin in Predicting Cervical Cancer Progression: A Systematic Review. Biology (Basel). 2022 Jun 23;11(7):956. doi: 10.3390/biology11070956.
Mehdi HK, Khan S, Siddiqui SA, Maheshwari V, Alam K, Akhtar K. Association of p16, Ki-67, and CD44 expression in high-grade squamous intraepithelial neoplasia and squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. J Cancer Res Ther. 2023;19(Suppl 1):36-41. doi:10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_1234_22.
Ouh YT, Kim HY, Yi KW, Lee NW, Kim HJ, Min KJ. Enhancing cervical cancer screening: review of p16/Ki-67 dual staining as a promising triage strategy. Diagnostics (Basel). 2024;14(4):451. doi:10.3390/diagnostics14040451.
Okoturo E, Rabiu K. Meta-analysis on the Diagnostic Performance of p16/Ki-67 Dual Immunostaining for Cervical Cancer Screening. Asian Pac J Cancer Biol. 2023;8(1):91-99. doi:10.31557/apjcb.2023.8.1.91-99.
Ayatollahi H, Ghaffarzadegan K, Ghaffarzadegan R, Ghaffarzadegan N. Investigation of the P16 and Ki67 Predictive Effect on the Progression of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 1 in Shahid Motahari Hospital of Urmia, Iran. J Obstet Gynecol Cancer Res. 2022;7(3):206-10. doi:10.30699/jogcr.7.3.206.
Hosseini MS, Talayeh M, Afshar Moghaddam N, Arab M, Farzaneh F, Ashrafganjoei T. Comparison of Ki67 index and P16 expression in different grades of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions. Caspian J Intern Med. 2023;14(1):69-75. doi:10.22088/cjim.14.1.69.
Luo H, Lian Y, Tao H, Zhao Y, Wang Z, Zhou J, et al. Relationship between p16/ki67 immunoscores and PAX1/ZNF582 methylation status in precancerous and cancerous cervical lesions in high-risk HPV-positive women. BMC Cancer. 2024 Sep 20;24(1):1171. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12920-4.
Singh P, Garg K, Singh A, Tripathi S. Expression of Ki-67 in premalignant and malignant lesion of cervix in tertiary care hospital in Uttar Pradesh. Int J Res Med Sci. 2023;11(5):1575-1581. doi:10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20231318.
Acosta Bedon A, Delgado-López D, Ochoa-Avilés C, Rivas-Párraga R, Vega Crespo B, Verhoeven V, et al. p16/Ki-67 dual staining as a predictive value for cervical cancer compared to other conventional triage tools: a descriptive literature review. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2024;45(4):1–15. doi: 10.22514/ejgo.2024.062.
Sukumar S, Arora A, Singh M, et al. Investigating the role of tumor microenvironment in modulating immune checkpoint inhibitors for cancer therapy. J Cancer Res Ther. 2024;20(1):8-15. doi:10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_239_23.
Wentzensen N, Schwartz L, Zuna RE, Smith K, Mathews C, Gold MA, et al. Performance of p16/Ki-67 immunostaining to detect cervical cancer precursors in a colposcopy referral population. Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Aug 1;18(15):4154-62. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-0270.
Kumari R, Joshee R, Repaswal A, Anita, Bhageerath, Chaudhary KS. Role of P16INk4a and Ki-67 immunostaining as specific biomarkers of cervical intraepithelial lesions among cervical biopsy samples: A diagnostic study. Int J Pharm Clin Res. 2023;15(6):1335-42.
Liu J, Su S, Liu Y. The value of Ki67 for the diagnosis of LSIL and the problems of p16 in the diagnosis of HSIL. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):7613. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-11584-z.
Qiu S, Wang Q, Jiang H, Feng L. Immunohistochemistry staining of Eag1 and p16/Ki-67 can help improve the management of patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after cold knife conization. Diagn Pathol. 2024;19(1):97. doi:10.1186/s13000-024-01523-z.
Minareci Y, AK N, Bayram A, Tosun ÖA, Murdan R, Onder S, et al. Prognostic Value of p16INK4A and Ki67 Co-expression in Patients with Vaginal Intraepithelial Neoplasia. Indian J Gynecol Oncol. 2024;22(2):45. doi: 10.1007/s40944-024-00810-3.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
ISSN
ISSN 












