Parkinson's Disease Prediction Using Deep Learning Classification Algorithms
Abstract
complaints arising from neurological disorders continue to increase today. At the same time, studies on diagnosis and treatment methods in medicine are increasing as technology advances. With the increasing interest in these areas, studies have been carried out on various diagnosis and follow-up systems related to Parkinson's disease. For this purpose, in this study, we studied the classification of a data set consisting of various voice recordings for each patient with the designed deep learning architecture in order to assist in the more objective diagnosis of Parkinson's disease. Although it is important for the estimation of the study to find different sound samples of each subject in the data set, it is not known how much these recordings represent all the sound recordings of the person. Recurrent neural networks, which are a deep learning architecture, are an efficient system that can achieve high success in voice data and can be preferred in the diagnosis and follow-up of Parkinson's disease. However, this study showed that in such a network design, much larger and more diverse data are needed to increase the classification rate, to make more accurate predictions in the field of medicine, and to make remote diagnosis.
References
Şakar BE. Çoklu Ses Kayıtları İçeren Bir Parkinson Konuşma Veri Kümesinin Toplanması ve Analizi [Collection and Analysis of a Parkinson’s Speech Dataset with Multiple Voice Recordings] [PhD thesis] [Turkish]. İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü; 2014. p. 1-30.
Apaydın H, Özekmekçi S, Oğuz S, Zileli İ. Parkinson Hastalığı ve Yakınları İçin El Kitabı [Parkinson Disease and Handbook for Relatives] [Turkish]. İstanbul: Bayçınar Tıbbi Yayıncılık ve Reklam Hiz. Tic. Ltd. Şti.; 2013.
Ramaker C, Marinus J, Stiggelbout AM, Van Hilten BJ. Systematic evaluation of rating scales for impairment and disability in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2002;17(5):867-76.
Ho A, Bradshaw JL, Iansek R. For better or for worse: the effect of Levodopa on speech in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2008;23(4):574-80.
Harel B, Cannizzaro M, Snyder PJ. Variability in fundamental frequency during speech in prodromal and incipient Parkinson’s disease: A longitudinal case study. Brain Cogn. 2004;56:24-29.
Kombrink S, Mikolov T, Karafiat M, Burget L. Recurrent neural network based language modeling in meeting recognition. In: Interspeech, ISCA; 2011 Aug 27-31; Florence, Italy. 2011. p. 2877-80.
Graves A, Jaitly N. Towards End-To-End Speech Recognition with Recurrent Neural Networks. In: Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Machine Learning, PLMR; 2014 Jun 21-26; Beijing, China. 2014;32(2):1764-72.
Arslan M. Bir İnsan Çiz Projektif Testi Yapay Zeka Tabanlı Sistem Tasarımı [A Human Figure Drawing Projective Test Artificial Intelligence-Based System Design] [master’s thesis] [Turkish]. İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi-Cerrahpaşa Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü; 2020. p. 24-40.
Şeker A, Diri B, Balık HH. Derin öğrenme yöntemleri ve uygulamaları hakkında bir inceleme [A Review on Deep Learning Methods and Applications] [Turkish]. Gazi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi. 2017;3(3):47-64
Poggio T, Girosi F. Networks for approximation and learning. IEEE. 1990;78(9):1481-97.
Hochreiter S, Schmidhuber J. Long Short-Term Memory. Neural Comput. 1997;9(8):1735-80.
Gers FA, Schmidhuber J, Cummins F. Learning to forget: continual prediction with LSTM. Neural Comput. 2000;12(10):2451–71.
Meyes R, Donauer J, Schmeing A, Meisen T. A recurrent neural network architecture for failure prediction in deep drawing sensory time series data. Elsevier. 2019;34:789-97.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
ISSN
ISSN 












