Characteristics and significance of cerebellum`s evolutionary changes, as a part of central nervous system, during the evolution of the human brain:part 1
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32345/SUPPLEMENT.2.2025.268-273Keywords:
Brain, cerebellum, cognitive functions, сommunication, еmotions, evolution, neuromorphology, neuropsychologyAbstract
Тhe evolution of the brain, particularly the cerebellum as a key component of the central nervous system, represents a critical focus in modern research across neuroscience, anthropology, psychology, and medicine. Special attention is given to the cerebellum’s role in shaping cognitive, emotional, and social functions, as well as its unique morphofunctional characteristics that have significantly transformed throughout Homo sapiens evolution. These evolutionary changes in the cerebellum enabled the emergence of new adaptive capacities, including optimization of social behavior, cognitive control, motor coordination, and sensory integration. Morphological studies have revealed the cerebellum's increasingly complex structure and functions, providing insight into the development of high-level cognition and behavior. Notably, investigations into HARs (human accelerated regions) suggest a strong genetic influence on cerebellar evolution, highlighting regulatory elements specific to Homo sapiens. The contemporary morphofunctional structure of the cerebellum demonstrates its intricate organization, consisting of multiple lobules and layers, each performing distinct functions. This organization allows the cerebellum to integrate sensorimotor signals, coordinate movement, maintain balance, and participate in non-motor functions such as speech, memory, social cognition, and emotions. Functional asymmetry and interactions with other brain regions are also crucial to understanding neuropsychological processes. Damage to the cerebellum manifests in a wide range of symptoms, from motor discoordination to emotional instability and social dysfunctions. In this context, studying cerebellar evolution holds not only academic but also practical value for diagnosing and treating neuropsychiatric and neurodegenerative disorders. A substantial portion of this study focuses on comparative analysis between the brains of Homo erectus—an important evolutionary link—and modern humans. Changes that occurred during brain globularization affected parietal and cerebellar protrusions, associated with advanced cognitive abilities such as abstract thinking, language, planning, and adaptation to changing environments. These characteristics differentiate Homo sapiens from Neanderthals and earlier hominins. The globular brain shape, which developed between 100,000 and 35,000 years ago, became a defining feature of modern human intellect. Moreover, the increased volume of the cerebellum and its numerous connections with other brain areas contributed to its functional complexity—from fine motor control to social bonding and communication. These aspects played a key role in the emergence of humans as social beings capable of self-awareness, abstraction, creativity, and cultural development. Thus, the cerebellum functions not only as a motor hub but also as a critical center for information integration, enabling cognitive complexity, social interaction, and emotional expression in Homo sapiens, and is essential for understanding the evolutionary roots of the human mind.
References
Bouret S, Paradis E, Prat S, et al. Linking the evolution of two prefrontal brain regions to social and foraging challenges in primates. eLife. 2024;12:e87780.4. doi:10.7554/eLife.87780.4
Beuriat P-A, Cristofori I, Gordon B, et al. The shifting role of the cerebellum in executive, emotional and social processing across the lifespan. Behav Brain Funct. 2022;18(1):1-12. doi:10.1186/s12993-022-00193-5
Sousa AMM, Meyer KA, Santpere G, et al. Evolution of the human nervous system function, structure, and development. Cell. 2017;170(2):226-247. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.06.036
Vandervert L, Manto M, Adamaszek M, et al. The evolution of the optimization of cognitive and social functions in the cerebellum and thereby the rise of Homo sapiens through cumulative culture. Cerebellum. 2024. doi:10.1007/s12311-024-01692-z
Carey MR. The cerebellum. Curr Biol. 2024;34(1):R7-R11. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2023.11.048
Невмержицька НМ, Яременко ЛМ. Характеристика стрептозотоцин-індукованої та окадаїн-індукованої експериментальних деменцій альцгеймеровського типу. Український Науковий Медичний Молодіжний журнал (спец.випуск). 2024;147(2):98-104. doi:10.32345/SUPPLEMENT.2.2024.98-104
Neubauer S, Hublin J-J, Gunz P. The evolution of modern human brain shape. Sci Adv. 2018;4(1):eaao5961. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aao5961
Fair T, Pollen AA. Genetic architecture of human brain evolution. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2023;80:102710. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2023.102710
Girskis KM, Stergachis AB, DeGennaro EM, et al. Rewiring of human neurodevelopmental gene regulatory programs by human accelerated regions. Neuron. 2021;109(17):2823-2836.e7. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2021.08.005
Suzuki IK. Molecular drivers of human cerebral cortical evolution. Neurosci Res. 2020;151:1-14. doi:10.1016/j.neures.2019.05.007
Benítez-Burraco A, Theofanopoulou C, Boeckx C. Globularization and domestication. Topoi. 2016;37(2):265–278. doi:10.1007/s11245-016-9399-7
Cakir B, Xiang Y, Tanaka Y, et al. Engineering of human brain organoids with a functional vascular-like system. Nat Methods. 2019;16(11):1169–1175. doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0586-5
Romero JE, Coupe P, Lanuza E, et al. Toward a unified analysis of cerebellum maturation and aging across the entire lifespan: A MRI analysis. Hum Brain Mapp. 2021. doi:10.1002/hbm.25293
Park MTM, Pipitone J, Baer LH, et al. Derivation of high-resolution MRI atlases of the human cerebellum at 3T and segmentation using multiple automatically generated templates. Neuroimage. 2014;95:217–231. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.03.037
D’Angelo E, Antonietti A, Casali S, et al. Modeling the cerebellar microcircuit: new strategies for a long-standing issue. Front Cell Neurosci. 2016;10:176. doi:10.3389/fncel.2016.00176
Kim J, Augustine GJ. Molecular layer interneurons: key elements of cerebellar network computation and behavior. Neuroscience. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2020.10.008
Sepp M, Leiss K, Murat F, et al. Cellular development and evolution of the mammalian cerebellum. Nature. 2023. doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06884-x
Sereno MI, Diedrichsen J, Tachrount M, et al. The human cerebellum has almost 80% of the surface area of the neocortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2020;117(32):19538–19543. doi:10.1073/pnas.2002896117
Miall RC. Cerebellum: Anatomy and function. In: Conn PM, ed. Neuroscience in the 21st Century: From Basic to Clinical. Springer; 2022:1563-1582. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-1997-6_38
Van Overwalle F, Manto M, Cattaneo Z, et al. Consensus paper: cerebellum and social cognition. Cerebellum. 2020;19(6):833–868. doi:10.1007/s12311-020-01155-1
Schmahmann JD, Guell X, Stoodley CJ, et al. The theory and neuroscience of cerebellar cognition. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2019;42:337–364. doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-070918-050258
Anteraper SA, Guell X, D'Mello A, et al. Disrupted cerebrocerebellar intrinsic functional connectivity in young adults with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder: a data-driven, whole-brain, high-temporal resolution functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Brain Connect. 2019;9(1):48–59. doi:10.1089/brain.2018.0581
Moberget T, Doan NT, Alnæs D, et al. Cerebellar volume and cerebellocerebral structural covariance in schizophrenia: a multisite mega-analysis of 983 patients and 1349 healthy controls. Mol Psychiatry. 2018;23(6):1512–1520. doi:10.1038/mp.2017.106
Shinn AK, Roh YS, Ravichandran CT, et al. Aberrant cerebellar connectivity in bipolar disorder with psychosis. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2017;2(5):438–448. doi:10.1016/j.bpsc.2016.07.002
Coolidge FL, Wynn T. The evolution of working memory. L’Annee Psychol. 2020;120(2):103. doi:10.3917/anpsy1.202.0103
Scanes CG, Toukhsati S. Animals and Human Society. Elsevier Science & Technology Books; 2017.
Kimbel WH, Villmoare B. From Australopithecus to Homo: the transition that wasn't. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016;371(1698):20150248. doi:10.1098/rstb.2015.0248
Árnason Ú, Hallström B. The reversal of human phylogeny: Homo left Africa as erectus, came back as sapiens sapiens. Hereditas. 2020;157(1):1. doi:10.1186/s41065-020-00163-9
Agbisit JB. Early Humans in Southeast Asia. The ASEAN; 2023.
Coqueugniot H, Hublin J-J, Veillon F, et al. Early brain growth in Homo erectus and implications for cognitive ability. Nature. 2004;431(7006):299–302. doi:10.1038/nature02852
Zhang Y, Wu X. Asymmetries of cerebellar lobe in the genus Homo. Symmetry. 2021;13(6):988. doi:10.3390/sym13060988
Neubauer S, Gunz P. Endocasts and the evo-devo approach to study human brain evolution. In: Digital Endocasts: From Skulls to Brains. Springer; 2018:173–190. doi:10.1007/978-4-431-56582-6_12
Hublin J-J, Neubauer S, Gunz P. Brain ontogeny and life history in Pleistocene hominins. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015;370(1663):20140062. doi:10.1098/rstb.2014.0062
Beaudet A, d’Errico F, Backwell L, et al. A reappraisal of the Border Cave 1 cranium (KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa). Quat Sci Rev. 2022;282:107452. doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2022.107452
Irurtzun A. The “globularization hypothesis” of the language-ready brain as a developmental frame for prosodic bootstrapping theories of language acquisition. Front Psychol. 2015;6:1817. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01817
Rappaport MB, Corbally CJ. Hypothesis and thought experiment: comparing cognitive competition of Neandertals and early humans, to our coming contest with AIs. J Soc Comput. 2024;5(2):122–131. doi:10.23919/jsc.2024.0012
Zhang Y, Li Z. Three-dimensional geometric morphometric study of the Xuchang 2 cranium. J Hum Evol. 2023;178:103347. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2023.103347
Vandervert L. How prediction based on sequence detection in the cerebellum led to the origins of stone tools, language, and culture and, thereby, to the rise of Homo sapiens. Front Cell Neurosci. 2018;12:408. doi:10.3389/fncel.2018.00408
Miller IF, Barton RA, Nunn CL. Quantitative uniqueness of human brain evolution revealed through phylogenetic comparative analysis. eLife. 2019;8:e41250. doi:10.7554/eLife.41250
Sivalingam AM, Pandian A. Cerebellar roles in motor and social functions and implications for ASD. Cerebellum. 2024. doi:10.1007/s12311-024-01720-y
D'Angelo E. The cerebellum gets social. Science. 2019;363(6424):229. doi:10.1126/science.aaw2571
Tattersall I. Endocranial volumes and human evolution. F1000Res. 2023;12:565. doi:10.12688/f1000research.131636.1
Moberget T, Ivry RB. Cerebellar contributions to motor control and language comprehension: searching for common computational principles. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2016;1369(1):154–171. doi:10.1111/nyas.13094
Vandervert L. The prominent role of the cerebellum in the social learning of the phonological loop in working memory: how language was adaptively built from cerebellar inner speech required during stone-tool making. AIMS Neurosci. 2020;7(3):333–343. doi:10.3934/neuroscience.2020020
Striedter GF. Incorporating evolution into neuroscience teaching. Front Educ. 2023;8:1278279. doi:10.3389/feduc.2023.1278279
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nataliia Nevmerzhytska, Maria Kharchenko, Marta Prokopiv

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
ISSN
ISSN 












