Selection of the Method of Laser Vision Correction for the Treatment of Acquired Ametropia Following Ophthalmic Surgical Procedures
Abstract
acquired ametropia developing after cataract, refractive, and vitreoretinal surgery remains a significant cause of visual function impairment and requires selection of an optimal enhancement strategy based on previous surgical history, corneal biomechanical status, and the patient’s functional demands. A prospective cohort analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and predictability of three laser enhancement techniques for acquired ametropia in 126 patients after cataract, refractive, and vitreoretinal surgery, with assessment of clinical, topographic, and functional parameters over a 12-month follow-up period. Patients were divided into three clinical groups according to the type of primary intervention, with further subdivision based on the applied laser correction technique, which enabled a differentiated comparative analysis of surface ablation, femtosecond-assisted flap-based technology, and lenticular extraction. The comprehensive evaluation included uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity, spherical equivalent, contrast sensitivity under photopic and mesopic conditions, tear film stability indices, Ocular Surface Disease Index, as well as corneal topo-tomographic parameters with elevation analysis and ectasia risk assessment. In patients after cataract surgery, the flap-based technique demonstrated the highest refractive predictability, statistically significantly better uncorrected distance visual acuity, and a low residual spherical equivalent while maintaining safe topographic parameters and stable mesopic contrast sensitivity, which is particularly relevant for eyes with implanted intraocular lenses. In the cohort after previous refractive surgery, surface ablation provided the most favorable biomechanical profile, minimal impact on the posterior corneal surface, and the best tear film stability parameters while preserving high functional visual quality, supporting the rationale for a flapless retreatment approach. In patients after vitreoretinal procedures, lenticular technology demonstrated the lowest residual spherical equivalent, the highest contrast sensitivity under mesopic and glare conditions, and the shortest period to normalization of ocular surface symptoms in the absence of clinically significant topographic instability, indicating functional advantages in this cohort. Statistical analysis confirmed the significance of intergroup differences across key parameters at a level of p less than 0.05. The findings demonstrate that the effectiveness of laser enhancement is determined not only by achievement of target refraction but also by comprehensive assessment of optical quality of vision, ocular surface status, and topographic safety. The results substantiate the necessity of an individualized approach to technology selection based on the type of primary intervention and corneal morphofunctional characteristics, thereby improving refractive predictability, minimizing biomechanical risks, and optimizing postoperative recovery of visual function.
References
Rohlf D, et al. Outcomes of LASIK vs PRK enhancement in eyes with prior cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2023;49(1):62–68. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001028
Study on postoperative refractive error after cataract surgery (5–20% >1D). J Clin Med. 2022;11(18):5447. doi:10.3390/jcm11185447
Ang M, Gatinel D, Reinstein DZ, et al. Refractive surgery beyond 2020. Eye. 2021;35(2):362–382. doi:10.1038/s41433-020-1096-5
Transepithelial PRK vs conventional PRK: meta-analysis. BioMed Res Int. 2022. doi:10.1155/2022/3022672
Lee BS, Gupta PK, Davis EA, Hardten DR. Outcomes of photorefractive keratectomy enhancement after LASIK. J Refract Surg. 2014;30(8):549–556. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20140711-08
Visual Outcomes of Photorefractive Keratectomy Enhancement After Primary LASIK. J Refract Surg. 2022. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20221019-01
Dupps WJ Jr, Randleman JB, Kohnen T, et al. KLEx nomenclature (joint editorial statement). J Refract Surg. 2023;39(11):726–727. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20231010-0
Hamoudi H, et al. Refractive change after vitrectomy for ERM in pseudophakic eyes. Acta Ophthalmol. 2013;91(5):434–436. doi:10.1111/j.1755-3768.2012.02574.x
Lenticule extraction with SCHWIND ATOS in high myopia: pilot study. J Optom. 2025. doi:10.1016/j.optom.2025.100553
KLEx outcomes (ATOS-mediated). J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2023;64(8). doi:10.3341/jkos.2023.64.8.666
Jiang X, et al. Influences of SMILE and FS-LASIK on corneal sub-basal nerves: network meta-analysis. J Refract Surg. 2022;38(4):277–284. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20220127-01
Li M, et al. Confocal comparison of corneal reinnervation after SMILE vs FS-LASIK. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e81435. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0081435
Ambrosio R Jr, et al. Tomographic and Biomechanical Index (TBI) for ectasia detection. J Refract Surg. 2017. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20170426-02
TFOS DEWS II Clinical Trial Design Report. Ocul Surf. 2017. doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.009
TFOS DEWS II Iatrogenic Report. Ocul Surf. 2017. doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.004
TFOS DEWS II Epidemiology Report. Ocul Surf. 2017. doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.003
PROWL (Patient-Reported Outcomes Following LASIK). JAMA. 2017;317(2):204–205. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.19323
Xu Y, et al. Dry Eye After SMILE and FS-LASIK: Meta-Analysis. Cornea. 2017. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000000999
Dry eye after refractive surgery: a meta-analysis. Can J Ophthalmol. 2020;55(2):99–106. doi:10.1016/j.jcjo.2019.07.005
Transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy enhancement for myopic regression. Oman J Ophthalmol. 2025. doi:10.4103/ojo.ojo_225_23
Moshirfar M, et al. Photorefractive keratectomy enhancement after small-incision lenticule extraction. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022;48(10):1170–1176. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000964
Sia RK, et al. Outcomes of wavefront-optimized PRK retreatment after prior keratorefractive surgery. J Ophthalmol. 2016;2016:2498136. doi:10.1155/2016/2498136
Stulting RD, et al. Results of laser in situ keratomileusis enhancement after primary LASIK. Ophthalmology. 2001;108(5):866–870. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(01)00635-2
Kobashi H, Kamiya K. Clinical outcomes of surface ablation enhancement after SMILE. Clin Ophthalmol. 2018;12:115–121. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S150915
Chen X, et al. Dry eye outcomes after KLEx versus femtosecond LASIK: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Ophthalmol. 2025;25:60. doi:10.1186/s12886-025-04260-z

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
ISSN
ISSN 














